Revise[Submit]
submit.revise.id
Run submission and peer review in one clear workspace.
From the first submission to the final decision, every manuscript, reviewer, and decision letter lives in one place, so your editorial team can always see what is waiting and what comes next.
Key features
Everything your editorial office needs, in one place.
Guided Submission Portal
Authors submit through a clear, step-by-step form with file uploads, metadata extraction, and co-author management.
Peer Review Management
Assign reviewers, set deadlines, track responses, and manage multiple review rounds with full audit trails.
Editorial Decision Tracking
Editors can accept, reject, or request revisions with structured decision letters and automatic notifications.
Multi-Round Revisions
Support unlimited revision rounds with clear tracking of changes between manuscript versions.
Role-Based Access
Configurable roles for editors-in-chief, section editors, reviewers, and authors with granular permissions.
Journal Configuration
Manage multiple journals with independent settings, submission types, and review workflows.
Contacts & communication
The people behind the workflow, in the same system.
Good peer review starts with a good reviewer pool. Contacts, segments, and outreach are built into Revise[Submit], so your reviewer list lives right where you invite reviewers.
Contact & Reviewer Database
One record per person — affiliations, subject areas, and review history — held in the same system that assigns them.
Smart Segments
Group the pool by subject area, activity, or any recorded field, and reuse those groups when inviting reviewers.
Email Campaigns
Send calls for papers and reviewer invitations from the journal's own address, with every send recorded against the contact.
Engagement Scoring
See who accepts, who declines, and who has gone quiet, before sending another invitation.
A real record
One manuscript, from submission to acceptance.
Submitted
The manuscript arrives through the portal with its metadata and files, and enters the editorial queue.
Revised
The author returns a new version after peer review, tracked against the version it replaces.
Accepted
The decision closes the round, and the article crosses to Revise[Production] with its metadata intact.
Workflow
From submission to decision.
Submission received
The manuscript arrives through the guided portal with metadata, files, and co-authors captured up front.
Reviewers assigned
Editors triage, invite reviewers from the contact database, and set deadlines for each invitation.
Review
Reviewers work to a structured form, and you can see in one place who has responded, who has declined, and who has not replied yet.
Decision
Accept, reject, or request revisions, with a structured decision letter and automatic notification to the author.
Revisions
The author returns a new version. Changes are tracked against the previous round rather than replacing it.
Final decision
Rounds repeat as the manuscript needs. Acceptance hands the article to Revise[Production] with its metadata intact.
After acceptance
Revise[Production]
JATS XML production, author proofreading, and publication-ready output — picking up exactly where Revise[Submit] leaves off.
Ready to try Revise[Submit]?
Write to us about your journal and you'll hear back from someone on the Revise team. If it isn't the right fit, we'll tell you honestly.
hello@revise.id
usually answered within one working day